Today, the police are required to maintain a clear and accurate record of the source of the evidence, and what happened to the evidence at every stage after its discovery. However, the source of that evidence was recorded and could not be explained. During the Simpson trial, there was a great deal of evidence that prosecution sought to produce at trial. Now, the lab requires its staff to take detailed notes to document all of their forensic work so that information is memorialized instead of left to memory of the technicians. In 1994, the crime lab did not routinely document its handling of the evidence. The crime lab received more funding and additional staff. Simpson’s defense attorney, Johnnie Cochran, referred to the LAPD scientific investigations division as a “cesspool of contamination” for sloppy evidence handling.Īfter Simpson’s acquittal on murder charges, LAPD scientific investigations division made significant changes. #Crime scene photos nicole brown simpson ronald goldman trialThe highly publicized trial offered the world of law enforcement a textbook example of what not to do while processing evidence at a crime scene.Īt trial, where Simpson faced murder charges for allegedly killing his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, Simpson’s defense attorney destroyed the prosecution’s case by exposing problems with the Los Angeles Police Department’s handling of evidence.Īmong the lessons learned by the Los Angeles Police Department was to account for all evidence and log it onto the evidence books, and to be always be honest with the jury, even if this honest approach would hurt the government’s case. Simpson murder trial shed a glaring light upon the flawed forensic and evidence gathering work of the Los Angeles Police Department.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |